By Sohaila Sharifi
When Maryam Ayoobi a 32-year
old Iranian woman was told of the high court’s final decision on her sentence,
she fainted. The magistrate court had sentenced her to death by stoning for
adultery. Mrs Ayoobi had appealed against the decision and waited with hope for
the outcome. On the beginning of March 2001, The high
court approved the previous sentence adding that her body should be burned
after her death. This means the most extreme form of punishment in the Islamic
law.
Stoning is a form of Islamic
punishment for adultery, which had been legislated by the Iranian government in
the penal code of the country and ever since the establishment of the Islamic
republic of Iran, many women and some men had been executed in such
fashion. The Penal code referring to
civil laws and social behaviours comes in five books and is called ‘Hodoud’ in
which the sexual acts outside marriage are defined as serious crime and
punishable by law. According to article 84, married women and men who commit
adultery will be stoned to death, while unmarried couples involved in unlawful
sexual acts might get away by milder punishments such as flogging. The
procedures of stoning and even the size of the stones have been clearly
codified by the law.
Fortunately the International Committee
against stoning took up her case and a campaign was lunched world-wide to save
her. So far her sentence has not been carried out and she is still in jail.
There are however, others
who are less lucky and the thunderstruck of their fate would not give them any
chance to cry out for help. So was an
un-named woman who according to the daily newspaper Entekhab, was stoned to
death early morning on Monday 21st May 2001by
the security forces and the guards of the infamous Evin prison, where she had
spent the past eight years of her life. The news reported by Entekhab and some
of Iranian radio stations did not even reveal her identity. She had been imprisoned
many years for playing in pornographic films and having unlawful sexual
relationships, crimes serious enough to make one deserve such an agonising
death.
Even though men and women
are equally guilty in front of law when they commit adultery, the law is unquestionably
harsher on women. The fraction of men
being stoned to death in the recent years is much lower. Mrs Ayoobi’s lover is
to be executed possibly by gun shot and the 24-year-old allegedly lover of
Shahla (another woman sentenced to death) is to be hanged in public. Even the way stoning is performed gives men
more (not many but more anyway) chances to escape. The victim is to be buried
in a ditch as stated in the law and stoned to death. Women must be buried up to
their necks, while the ditch for men is up to their waist. If a man or woman
manages to pull her-himself up of the ditch and run
away he/she must be pardoned. Logically speaking the chances a woman who is
buried all the way to her neck to be able to pull herself up are really rare.
“In Iran stoning someone to
death is not a crime choosing the wrong stone is” read a banner hanged by the
International Campaign for the Defence of Women’s Rights in Iran, in the
Trafalgar Square for the International Women’s Day demonstration. There is a
legal base for this statement. According to article 104 of the penal code
stones used in stoning must be of proper size that is “not so large that the offender would die by receiving
one or two hits, nor too small to be defined as pebbles”
Although there are some Muslims
who do not approve of this punishment, stoning has always been associated with
Islam and has been carried out in the Islamist societies throughout the
history. Those who are against stoning
argue that there are no clear instructions in the Qoran (the holly book) about
stoning one to death. They believe that the book has been interpreted inaccurately
and stoning has never been mentioned in it. The majority of Muslim Ulema’s
however, appear to have found bases for stoning both in the Qoran and Hadith (Sayings
and stories about prophet Mohammed’s behaviours told
by his close followers.). The following narration could be found in many
versions of the Hadith books and is an example used frequently by those
supporting stoning.
“ Narrated Jabir: A man from
the tribe of Aslam came to the prophet and confessed that he had committed an
illegal sexual intercourse. The prophet
turned away from him, until the man bore witness against himself four
times. Then the prophet said, ‘are you
mad?’ the man said ‘no’. The prophet
asked ‘are you married?’ the man replied ‘yes’.
The prophet ordered Muslims to stone him to death. He was stoned to death in Musalla. When the stones troubled him he fled, but he
was cough and stoned till he died. The
prophet spoke well of him and offered his funeral prayers.” (Hadith, volume 8, book 82, number 810)
They might disagree on the
forms of punishment, but it is widely accepted among Muslims that fornication
is a major crime and deserves sever punishment.
Sexual acts in the Muslim thinking are not private matters of
individuals; they are measure of honour for the whole society. A married man or
woman having sexual intercourse outside marriage, do not only commit a crime
against one or two individuals (their husband or wife) but they will transgress
the honour of their society as a whole and therefore they must be punished in
public and in a very painful way. Taqteel is the word used in the Quran
for painful executions. At the time of
the prophet Mohammed Rajem, (stoning) had been such a method and it seems that Muslim
leaders had followed the tradition for 1500 years.
There have been some
attempts to put an end to stoning in the countries it is administered. A very recent organisation as such is the
International Committee against stoning, which is a network of many individual,
groups and human right bodies world-wide. According to Mina Ahadi the
co-ordinator of this committee, stoning is not a simple cultural practice
carried out among certain nationalities, it is an open
crime against humanity and must not be tolerated by the world. Ms Ahadi an Iranian woman activist living in exile, believes that those administering stoning and making
laws about it are the real criminals and must be put on trail for it.
The organisation has taken
the issue to European commission on Human rights and has demanded official
action against Iranian government.
On the
In the last two years the
number of public stoning in
The cases of stoning might be only few a year, they might be very rare indeed, but that dose not justify the fact that in some parts of the world stoning has been codified and perfectly acceptable by law. If a single case of witch burning is acceptable in the modern world, maybe one can digest rare numbers of stoning too. But lets face it, one case of stoning is too many and it is our responsibility to stop it.